The Constitution (Proportional Representation) Bill 2000, as passed by the Assembly but rejected by the Council, would have general elections for a Council of 40 MLCs. There would be 8 provinces, each with 5 MLCs. This model involves a greater reduction in the number of MLCs than Model 3, and would remove the alternating terms of MLCs. The quota of 16.7% is higher than the 12.5% quota for Model 3. The motivation for setting such a high quota might revive some of the arguments used against the contentious Tasmanian change from 7 MHAs per electorate to 5. The PRSAV-T does not favour the size of the group to be elected being as low as 5, and would be completely opposed to the number being lower that that. Nevertheless, had that Bill provided for Hare-Clark PR (Robson Rotation rather than group voting tickets) it would have created a tolerable, though not ideal, system.