|
|
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
SOCIETY OF |
|||
|
Tel +613
9589 1802 |
Tel +61429176725 |
|
BEAUMARIS VIC 3193 |
|
|
|
2010-06-03 |
|||
|
Definition of
Proportional Representation |
|
Dictionary
Definition: Proportional
representation is a generic term, and it does not refer to a precise method
of implementing the philosophy it denotes. The Macquarie Dictionary
definition (... a system of electing representatives to a legislative assembly in
which there are a number of members representing any one electorate. The
number of successful candidates from each party is directly proportional to
the percentage of the total vote won by the party. Compare
first-past-the-post, preferential voting.) is
useful, although it confuses the matter by contrasting PR with
preferential voting, despite the fact that all the PR systems used in
Australia are preferential voting systems, as we explain below. The Compact Oxford Dictionary
definition of proportional representation
is "an electoral system in which parties gain seats in proportion to
the number of votes cast for them". That
definition refers to "parties" but, like that of the Macquarie
Dictionary, not specifically to "political parties", and it is
important to note that certain types of PR system operate on the basis of
party groupings, yet others are as free from that basis as any other
electoral system can be. Definition of Quota-preferential PR: Quota-preferential Proportional Representation
is an electoral system that has multi-member electorates in which the
percentage of the total votes in each electorate that is required to elect
each successful candidate (after any distribution of preferences of surplus
votes or votes of candidates excluded during the count) is as close as
practicable to the percentage that each member is of the total number of
members representing that electorate. That percentage, the quota, is
set such that the residue of votes after all quotas have been used to elect
the prescribed number of candidates is just below a quota. Quota-preferential
PR versus Party List:
The two major groupings of PR are:
The Proportional
Representation Society of Australia advocates the use of quota-preferential
PR systems, which is the broad basis of the system that Victoria's Local
Government Act 1989 prescribes for elections in multi-councillor
electoral districts, and opposes the use of party list systems, or even quasi
party list systems, such as those now used for the City of Melbourne and for
NSW local government, which employ the above-the-line and below-the-line
device imposed on the Senate electoral system in 1984. We seek to have direct election of all councillors
prescribed, without any Group Voting Tickets or other party-based
device, as applies for all Tasmanian and South Australian local government
elections. Party list systems were
originally implemented when the South Australian Legislative Council and the
A.C.T. Legislative Assembly first used PR, but in both cases public opinion rejected
them and their inescapable character of placing the real power of
deciding the people to be elected in the hands of political parties, which
alone decide who will be on the lists, and the order they will appear on
them, so they were replaced by quota-preferential systems. Need for Countback and Robson
Rotation: Our letter
to Victoria's municipal councils of 21st August 2003 urged them to
call on the State Government to introduce the important additional features
of countback
and Robson Rotation, which greatly
enhance the Hare-Clark PR
systems used in Tasmania and the ACT for the elections of their legislatures
and municipal councillors, but are absent in NSW
and SA. A good background to the
use of quota-preferential PR is the history page on the PRSA Web site (the local
government aspects are distinguished by being displayed in green text there). |