QUOTA  logo  NOTES
Newsletter of the Proportional Representation Society of Australia


           QN2023A             March 2023        www.prsa.org.au


      • New South Wales 2023 Elections for both Houses of its Parliament
         
  • Comparing the Lower House Victorian 2022 election with that of NSW in 2023


 

 

  New South Wales 2023 Elections for both Houses of its Parliament

 

New South Wales held a general election for its Legislative Assembly, and a periodic election for half  the members of its Legislative Council, on 25 March 2023. A redistribution of Legislative Assembly seats took place in August 2021. All available seats in both houses were contested by the Coalition, Labor and the Greens. A minority Labor Government, with support by Greens and some Independents, resulted.

 

Legislative Assembly: The incumbent three-term Coalition Government won only 36 of the 93 seats, after winning 48 in 2019. That decrease was accompanied by a decrease for that house in the Coalition’s two-party-preferred vote, versus Labor, to 45.7% in 2023, from 52.0% in 2019.

 

As Table 1 below shows, Labor’s first-preference vote grew to 37.0% in 2023, from 33.3% in 2019.

 

Party

2019

2023

Votes (%)

Seats (%)

Votes (%)

Seats (%)

Labor

33.3

38.7

37.0

48.4

Liberal

30.4

37.6

26.8

26.9

Greens

10.7

 3.2

  9.7

  0.3

Nationals

  4.8

14.0

  8.6

11.8

Other parties

  5.1

 3.2

  9.1

  0.0

Independent

  6.1

 3.2

  8.8

 9.7

 

 
Table 1: Votes versus seats in NSW’s Legislative Assembly


Table 2 below compares the results of three different counting systems. The last column is not from a detailed analysis like those for some chambers, but is just an estimate using State-wide first preference data.


Groupings

Percentage of first

preference votes

State-wide

Percentages of MLAs that were or might have been elected in 2023 under different counting systems for NSW’s Legislative Assembly

Pre-1920

single-

member

divisions:

plurality (First-past-the-post)


Present

single-member

divisions:

single

transferable

vote

Possible 

future
multi-

member  

divisions: 

PR-STV

Labor

37.0

      45

  48

37

Coalition

35.4

44*

  39

35

Greens

9.7

4

  3

10

Independent

8.8

7

10

9

Others

9.1

0

0

9

TOTAL

           100.0

           100

                100

            100

 

Table 2: Comparing 3 different counting systems

 

(* providing the Coalition stood only 1 candidate per division)

 

Legislative Council: The term of the 42 MLCs is twice that of the 93 MLAs, so only 21 of the Upper House seats become vacant at each conjoint election for both Houses. At each periodic election for MLCs, a State-wide electorate is used with PR-STV counting, so the   quota for election in 2023 was 209,858 votes, which was just over 4.76% of the State-wide
vote of 4,616,858 formal ballots.                                                                                             


 

Party

2019

2023

Votes (%)

Seats (%)

Votes (%)

Seats (%)

Labor

30

33

36

38

Coalition

35

38

30

33

Greens

10

10

9

10

One Nation

7

10

6

5

Legalise Cannabis

-

-

4

5

Liberal Democrats

2

0

4

5

Shooters, Fishers

5

5

3

5

Animal Justice

2

5

2

0

Others

9

0

4

0

INFORMAL

6

 

6

 

 

Table 3: Votes versus seats in NSW's recent Legislative Council polls

 


Mark Latham used a weakness in the Constitution’s Section 15
 that a former senator, Brian Harradine, warned against


The Leader of the One Nation Party in the NSW Legislative Council, Hon. Mark Latham MLC, is a former Federal Leader of the Labor Party, who resigned from the House of Representatives in 2005. In 2017 he resigned from the Labor Party, and was briefly a member of the Liberal Democrats Party, but by 2018 he had joined his present party, One Nation.

 

In 2019, he was one of two ON candidates that each won an eight-year term in the NSW Legislative Council. ON’s only candidate elected in 2023 was him, so his ploy let him sit for 8 years instead of his remaining 4, but it did not gain the extra MLC sought.

 

Soon before the 2023 periodic election for 21 seats in the 42-member Council, with four years of his eight-year term still remaining, Mr Latham resigned his seat and nominated again for a full eight-year term.
 

The loophole enabling it - also in the 1977 alteration made to Section 15 of the Australian Constitution - of the combination of periodic elections and the indirect filling of casual vacancies by party appointments, is a grave weakness. The former Tasmanian Independent senator Brian Harradine said he believed it should never be exploited, on publicly revealing it in 1996.

                                                                                                                  

 

Comparing the Lower House 2022 Victorian election
with that of New South Wales in 2023

 

The vagaries of the single-member system of elections are clearly demonstrated by a comparison of the recent New South Wales election for its Legislative Assembly with the result in Victoria in 2022.

 

As the following table shows, the percentages of first preferences for candidates from each of the main parties – Labor and the Liberal and National Coalition – were very similar in the two elections.

 

In both elections, Labor candidates received more first preferences than the Coalition’s, and in both elections Labor comfortably won the ‘two-party preferred vote’ (2-PP), which is first and subsequent preferences favouring Labor on the one hand versus the Coalition, Labor won 55.0% 2-PP in Victoria and 53.0% 2-PP in NSW. The number of seats won in the Legislative Assemblies, however, was strikingly different, with Labor winning a large absolute majority in Victoria, but it won just below a bare majority in NSW.

 

 

Party

Victoria 2022

New South Wales 2023

% of votes

No. of seats

% of seats

% of votes

No. of seats

% of seats

Labor

36.7%

56

  63.6%

  37.0%

45

  48.4%

Liberal

 29.8%

19

  21.6%

  26.8%

25

  26.8%

Nationals

    4.7%

 9

  10.2%

    8.6%

11

  11.8%

Greens

 11.5%

 4

    4.5%

    9.7%

 3

    3.2%

Others

 17.4%

 0

    0.0%

18.0% 

 9

    9.7%

 

 

Table 4: Votes versus seats in recent Legislative Assembly polls


As Table 4 shows, the Labor Party is grossly over-represented in Victoria’s Legislative Assembly, but less significantly so in New South Wales. In Victoria, National Party candidates won 10.2% of the seats with 4.7% of the vote, while Greens candidates won 4.5% of the seats with 11.5% of the vote.

 

That over-representation of the National Party and under-representation of the Greens is a common feature in elections in Victoria. It is due to the locational bias of single-member districts, where smaller parties that have wide support across the whole State get fewer representatives than those with concentrated support in a small number of districts.

 

Another big difference between the two elections is the large number of 9 ‘other’, mostly Independent, candidates elected in NSW, versus no Independents in Victoria, despite the first preference vote for ‘others’ being similar between the two elections.

 

It has been suggested that the optional preferential system in NSW meant that Labor won fewer seats. However, in both States, the great majority of seats was won by the candidate with the highest number of first preference votes. In Victoria, 85 of the 88 seats were won by the candidate that led on first preference votes. In NSW, 88 of the 93 seats were won by the candidate that led on first preference votes.


In Victoria, Hastings was the only seat where a Coalition candidate led on first preference votes, but Labor finally won the seat. In New South Wales, on the other hand, the Liberals or Nationals led on first preference votes in five seats that they ultimately lost.

In one of those five, Penrith, the Liberal candidate’s lead on first preference votes was only four votes, but Labor won it with 51.6% of the vote after transfers. Table 5 below lists the seats where the leading candidate changed after the transfer of preferences.

State

Seat

Leader on first preference votes

Eventual

winner

Victoria

Hastings

Liberal

Labor

Mildura

Independent

National

Morwell

Labor

National

New South Wales

Monaro

National

Labor

Penrith

Liberal

Labor

South Coast

Liberal

Labor

Wakehurst

Liberal

Independent

Wollondilly

Liberal

Independent

       Table 5: Votes versus seats in NSW’s recent Legislative Council polls



SA’s Parliament changed plurality counting to

PR-STV in bill for a “First Nations Voice” to it

 

On 23 February 2023, South Australia’s Labor Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Hon. Kyam Maher MLC, introduced the Government's First Nations Voice Bill 2023 into the Legislative Council of South Australia.

 

In Schedule 1, Part 5 of that Bill, as introduced, Clauses 11(1) and 13(1)(b) unfortunately specified the use of plurality voting - which was replaced by transferable voting for the Senate as long ago as 1919 - as the system for marking and counting the votes for elections of the members of the Voice.

 

Hansard records, under the heading, Schedule 1, the success of a Greens MLC, Hon. Tammy Franks, in changing from plurality counting to PR-STV, with optional preferences. That record also refers to good work of Deane Crabb, PRSA(SA) Vice-President, and Ben Raue of The Tally Room, in urging that change.

 

The Legislative Council passed the amended Bill. On 26 March 2023, the House of Assembly later passed it, and it gained Royal Assent in an Executive Council meeting, at a well-attended public ceremony held on the steps of South Australia’s Parliament House, on North Terrace, Adelaide.

 

© 2023 Proportional Representation Society of Australia

National President: Dr Jeremy Lawrence   npres@prsa.org.au